On 26/05/2025 14:27, Yassine Ouaissa wrote:
On 26.05.2025 12:57, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:This is not how the process works and it is not making reviewers life
On 26/05/2025 09:25, Yassine Ouaissa wrote:
On 23.05.2025 19:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 23/05/2025 19:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:Hi Krzysztof,
On 23/05/2025 15:41, Yassine Ouaissa wrote:
Add compatible for video decoder on allegrodvt Gen 3 IP.Please do not send the same patches over and over again. You got review
Signed-off-by: Yassine Ouaissa <yassine.ouaissa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
which you need to address.
Once address you send NEXT version with proper CHANGELOG for each patch
or top of cover letter. See submitting patches... or just use b4. This
should be actually requirement for this work.
Anyway, I see all of previous review ignored so let's be explicit:
NAK
Make sure that i'm not ignoring anyone reviews, i sent a new set of
patches to start cleanly, and i have sent you an email about this.
It is still v1 - the same? - while you already sent three patchsets before.
As i mentioned, this patch is sent to start cleanly, so it still v1.
And the previous patchsets should be ignored.
easier. It makes it impossible for us to compare (try yourself with `b4
diff`) and forces to re-review everything every time.
Best regards,
Krzysztof