Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for qcom sa8255p-ride

From: Deepti Jaggi
Date: Fri Apr 25 2025 - 01:01:20 EST




On 4/23/25 23:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 23/04/2025 01:12, Deepti Jaggi wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8255p-ride.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8255p-ride.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..cb866f897d0a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sa8255p-ride.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (c) 2024-2025 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
>> + */
>> +
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> +
>> +#include "sa8255p.dtsi"
>> +#include "sa8255p-pmics.dtsi"
>> +#include "sa8255p-scmi.dtsi"
>> +
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SA8255P Ride";
>> + compatible = "qcom,sa8255p-ride", "qcom,sa8255p";
>
> NAK
>
> Missing bindings. This is some weird process you have there. Reach to
> your internal guideline before you start posting. It explains this.
>

I followed the approach used for other bindings [1] [2] [3],
which were part of the original series and were sent as separate patches
and accepted. I misjudged that the SoC binding could also be sent as a
separate patch. I will combine the remaining bindings along with
the device tree into a single series.

The UART/QUP driver changes have been posted as a separate series [4]
along with the UART bindings. Please advise if the UART/QUP bindings should
also be included as part of next series with dt changes.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910165926.2408630-1-quic_nkela@xxxxxxxxxxx/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240910171534.2412263-1-quic_nkela@xxxxxxxxxxx/
[3]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240905194741.3803345-1-quic_nkela@xxxxxxxxxxx/
[4]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250418151235.27787-2-quic_ptalari@xxxxxxxxxxx/

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

--Regards,
Deepti