Re: SNMP that works

Dennis (dennis@etinc.com)
Fri, 12 Nov 1999 15:12:19 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Werner Koch: "Re: Traffic Shaper by Alan Cox vs. Packet Scheduler [Virus checked]"
Previous message: Dennis: "Re: Traffic Shaper by Alan Cox vs. Packet Scheduler [Virus"

At 09:29 PM 11/11/99 +0200, Mircea Ciocan wrote:
> Umm, what exactly CMU-snmp for Linux don't report OK ???
>
>Dennis wrote:
>>
>> Can someone give a pointer to a version of snmp for 2.2 kernels that
>> reports the correct values?

Well is WAS giving bogus values for the byte counts...unless its been
repaired. Kind of funny that so few people noticed.

dennis

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Werner Koch: "Re: Traffic Shaper by Alan Cox vs. Packet Scheduler [Virus checked]"
Previous message: Dennis: "Re: Traffic Shaper by Alan Cox vs. Packet Scheduler [Virus"