Re: different between LILO & LOADLIN

Glynn Clements (glynn@sensei.co.uk)
Mon, 25 Jan 1999 16:04:51 +0000 (GMT)


hoelc wrote:

> Is there any different in the Linux system function, if it is booted
> with LOADLIN versus LILO ?

In general, no. However, if you boot DOS or Windows first, then use
loadlin to start Linux, some hardware devices may be configured by
DOS/Windows. This can be useful if you have a device which Linux can
access once it's initialised, but can't actually initialise itself.

> I have a Linux system installed in my PC's secondary harddisk, and the
> LILO is installed in the second harddisk's boot sector; The primary
> harddisk is installed with Windows98. How should I boot the system with
> LILO?

If your BIOS allows you to boot from a specific hard drive, you should
just be able to tell it to boot from the second drive (D:). Otherwise,
you can configure lilo to write its boot sector to the MBR of the
first drive (C:).

> And how should I pass the Ethernet board parameter to the Kernel?

Add something like

append = ether=10,0x300,eth0

to lilo.conf.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@sensei.co.uk>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu