lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Bcast:127.255.255.255 Mask:255.0.0.0
EtherTalk Phase 2 addr:0/0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1
RX packets:423 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:0 errors:87667 dropped:423 overruns:0
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:94:A9:8C:4C
inet addr:172.16.20.218 Bcast:172.16.20.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:5952 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0
TX packets:0 errors:4553016 dropped:61 overruns:3397
Interrupt:9 Base address:0x7400
it seems to be no TX packets well sent...
with eth0, but with lo too... Perhaps it is not a problem with the adapter...
Any idea ?
On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Phil Z wrote:
>Ahh.. Sorry about that. NIC means "Network Interface Card". Any way, you
>might try switching full-duplex off and see what happens. I have seen
>some certain combinations of hardware cause the same kind of performance
>problems you are describing.
>
>> >> When u/l files to my linux box I got an average speed of 200Kb/s
>> >> When d/d files, the speed is normal : about 10Mb/s...
>> >>
>> >> Any idea ?
>> >> -
>> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
>> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>> --
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ybizeul@club-internet.fr http://perso.club-internet.fr/ybizeul
>>
>> Wintel sucks. Gates sucks. France Telecom sucks.
>> Macintosh & Linux/AfterStep rulez
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu