> David E. Wach wrote:
>
> > For comparison, you might want to also look at BreezeCOM:
> >
> > http://www.breezecom.com/
>
> I was just about ready to buy some of these. I dawned on me to ask and I found
> out..
>
> > Check out their "Wireless LAN Products". They are completely transparent
> > to the operating system - just plug them into an ethernet card.
>
> ..they are a buffered device, providing latency of 100ms+.
> Products like the Wavelan and Aironet are typically <8ms
> depending on distance, giving true T1/E1 performance.
>
>
Uh, check your source... this is across a breezecom link (about 4 miles,
one of our short links):
PING bogus.name.tld (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=9.289 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=9.320 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=9.325 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=9.597 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=9.408 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=9.565 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=9.868 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=11.067 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=11.545 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=9.277 ms
--- firewall.clipper.net ping statistics ---
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 9.277/9.826/11.545/0.767 ms
(names and ip's changed to protect the innocent ;)
Sorry about the wacky times, this was a freeBSD box.
-d
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ David E. Wach | Lead Programmer/System Engineer | ClipperNet Internet Access Services | "Zeros and ones will take 541.431.3360 | us there..." david@clipper.net | http://www.clipper.net | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu