> > wouldn't 8) BTW route utility can make it itself.
> Cool,
What's cool? Argh, langauge problem, I meaned "could",
rather than "can" modality.
> But how does route know -not- to delete
> the second route above ? OK, question is not
> very clear , What does 'route del' match on
> to determine which route to remove ?
In 2.1 both SIOCADDRT and SIOCDELRT require netmask.
So that to flush tables, route have to read it at first.
> > > does 2.1.x support equal cost path routing ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu