> wouldn't a
>
> route del -net x.x.x.0
>
> without netmask become a sort of wild card if we had
>
> route add -net x.x.x.0 netmask 255.255.255.127 dev eth0
> route add -net x.x.x.0 netmask 255.255.255.127 dev eth1
>
> Removing both routes ? , May not be what we want .
wouldn't 8) BTW route utility can make it itself.
> does 2.1.x support equal cost path routing ?
Yes. Only gated is not updated to make it. Do you need it?
I have some out-of-date patch for gated, and can renew it,
if someone needs it. Apparently, for my lovely gated-3.6Alpha2 8)
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu