Re: Re: Kernelroute problem with 2.1.122

Mr. James W. Laferriere (babydr@baby-dragons.com)
Sun, 27 Sep 1998 10:35:31 -0700 (PDT)


Hello Alexey & All,

On Sun, 27 Sep 1998 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > It seems that you always have to give the gateway when you delete a route
> > which seems to make sense. Alexey??
>
> No, it was not intentional. I'll fix it.
> Gateway should be matched only if it is specified.
wouldn't a

route del -net x.x.x.0

without netmask become a sort of wild card if we had

route add -net x.x.x.0 netmask 255.255.255.127 dev eth0
route add -net x.x.x.0 netmask 255.255.255.127 dev eth1

Removing both routes ? , May not be what we want .
does 2.1.x support equal cost path routing ?

> Alexey Tia, JimL
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere - Network Engineer - babydr@nwrain.net |
| System Techniques - 25416 - 22nd S. - Des-Moines, WA 98198 |
| Give me VMS -or- Give me Linux -but- only on AXP |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu