On Sun, 27 Sep 1998 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> Hello!
> > wouldn't a
> > route del -net x.x.x.0
> >
> > without netmask become a sort of wild card if we had
> >
> > route add -net x.x.x.0 netmask 255.255.255.127 dev eth0
> > route add -net x.x.x.0 netmask 255.255.255.127 dev eth1
> >
> > Removing both routes ? , May not be what we want .
>
> wouldn't 8) BTW route utility can make it itself.
Cool, But how does route know -not- to delete
the second route above ? OK, question is not
very clear , What does 'route del' match on
to determine which route to remove ?
> > does 2.1.x support equal cost path routing ?
>
> Yes. Only gated is not updated to make it. Do you need it?
> I have some out-of-date patch for gated, and can renew it,
> if someone needs it. Apparently, for my lovely gated-3.6Alpha2 8)
I'd be very interested in a patch against ,
ftp://ftp.gated.org/net-research/gated/gated-3-5-10.tar.gz
if available , If not one against 3.6.a2 (a venerable daemon)
would be good also .
The above gated-3-5-10 btw is available to the public .
> Alexey Tnx, JimL
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| James W. Laferriere - Network Engineer - babydr@nwrain.net |
| System Techniques - 25416 - 22nd S. - Des-Moines, WA 98198 |
| Give me VMS -or- Give me Linux -but- only on AXP |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu