Re: WaveLAN application

Jim Flowers (jflowers@ezo.net)
Sun, 27 Sep 1998 11:24:16 -0400

As I recall the Latvians felt the WaveLAN units required a more complex
setup (JNOS) and now base their entire line of products that they sell on
Aironet. Is there other support for "known to be a better choice"? Aironet
is about 3 times as expensive (access point is a requirement) and slower
(although guaranteed).

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Cinege <dcinege@psychosis.com>
To: Frostine RHL <frost@hita.or.jp>
Cc: linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu <linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sunday, September 27, 1998 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: WaveLAN application

>Frostine RHL wrote:
>
>http://www.linuxrouter.org/
>Several people already doing wireless with LRP.
>
>> In "Re: WaveLAN application",
>> ""Jim Flowers" <jflowers@ezo.net>" wrote:
>>
>> Yes, quite so!
>> When I have introduced WaveLAN into my ISP, They are not familiar to
>> radio modem and Nobody has known WaveLAN is supported on Linux.
>> Then, they are interested in WaveLAN for an experiment.
>
>Aironet is known to be a better choice. Nice reading:
>
>http://www.latnet.lv/LATNET/RADIOLink/
>
>--
>http://www.linkscape.net/ Linkscape Internet Services 732-541-4214
>http://www.linuxrouter.org/ Linux Router Project
>
>Please, no more BubbaVision.
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu