Re: linux-next: net merge conflicts

[David Miller]

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:55:30 +1100

> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 23:29:18 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > When networking is disabled, powerpc probably should not include
> > networking header files, nor provide networking related arch
> > specific functions.
> 
> OK, I always thought that we didn't like conditional includes and that
> include files should make themselves safe from being included in
> unexpected circumstances. In particular, until now these include files
> have not caused problems ...

There is a good argument supporting that, true.

Maybe it should be fixed that way after all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html