minimum TCP retransmit timer
From: Andrew Athan
Date: Mon Sep 25 2006 - 09:14:15 EST
Is the minimum TCP retransmit timer in 2.6 still 200ms ? We are running
a gigabit networking environment, and experiencing some packet loss (I'm
assuming due to noise). Due to the high performance nature of our
applications, a 200ms retransmit timer is just too long (from an
application perspective). Packet loss doesn't seem unacceptably high,
it's just that when it does, 200ms delay is just too much.
I am toying with the idea of reducing the RTO value used by linux hosts
in our network, as a way of reducing latency when errors do occur. I'm
assuming this may increase the number of unecessary retransmissions, but
since we are at about 5% utilization on the network, that's probably
ok. However, I definitely want to avoid exciting other aspects of the
TCP stack, such as slow start.
Can anyone comment on all of this?
Andrew Athan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html