minimum TCP retransmit timer

From: Andrew Athan
Date: Mon Sep 25 2006 - 09:14:15 EST



Is the minimum TCP retransmit timer in 2.6 still 200ms ? We are running a gigabit networking environment, and experiencing some packet loss (I'm assuming due to noise). Due to the high performance nature of our applications, a 200ms retransmit timer is just too long (from an application perspective). Packet loss doesn't seem unacceptably high, it's just that when it does, 200ms delay is just too much.

I am toying with the idea of reducing the RTO value used by linux hosts in our network, as a way of reducing latency when errors do occur. I'm assuming this may increase the number of unecessary retransmissions, but since we are at about 5% utilization on the network, that's probably ok. However, I definitely want to avoid exciting other aspects of the TCP stack, such as slow start.

Can anyone comment on all of this?

Andrew Athan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html