Re: Route cache performance under stress

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@digeo.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 19:41:56 EST

Previous message: Krishna Kumar: "[PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types."
In reply to: Martin Josefsson: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
Next in thread: Simon Kirby: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Martin Josefsson <gandalf@wlug.westbo.se> wrote:
>
> Any reason you're not using get_order() ?

hm.

a) mips64 and cris seem to have forgotten to implement it.

b) ppc and ia64 just had to sneak a bit of asm into their version

c) all other architectures did a copy-n-paste.

I get the feeling that we need just a single copy of this guy, in
<linux/bitops.h>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Previous message: Krishna Kumar: "[PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types."
In reply to: Martin Josefsson: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
Next in thread: Simon Kirby: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:03 EST