[PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types.

From: Krishna Kumar (krkumar@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 13:14:10 EST

Hi,

I am using 2.5.68 and found XFRM_MSG_BASE being defined, but RTM_BASE used for
all XFRM messages, changed it. Current mailer (hopefully) shouldn't screw up
the tabs.

Thanks,

- KK

diff -ruN linux-2.5.68.org/include/linux/xfrm.h linux-2.5.68/include/linux/xfrm.h
--- linux-2.5.68.org/include/linux/xfrm.h 2003-05-23 11:02:27.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.5.68/include/linux/xfrm.h 2003-05-23 11:04:02.000000000 -0700
@@ -104,17 +104,17 @@
  /* Netlink configuration messages. */
  #define XFRM_MSG_BASE 0x10

-#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSA (RTM_BASE + 0)
-#define XFRM_MSG_DELSA (RTM_BASE + 1)
-#define XFRM_MSG_GETSA (RTM_BASE + 2)
-
-#define XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY (RTM_BASE + 3)
-#define XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY (RTM_BASE + 4)
-#define XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY (RTM_BASE + 5)
-
-#define XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI (RTM_BASE + 6)
-#define XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE (RTM_BASE + 7)
-#define XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE (RTM_BASE + 8)
+#define XFRM_MSG_NEWSA (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 0)
+#define XFRM_MSG_DELSA (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 1)
+#define XFRM_MSG_GETSA (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 2)
+
+#define XFRM_MSG_NEWPOLICY (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 3)
+#define XFRM_MSG_DELPOLICY (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 4)
+#define XFRM_MSG_GETPOLICY (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 5)
+
+#define XFRM_MSG_ALLOCSPI (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 6)
+#define XFRM_MSG_ACQUIRE (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 7)
+#define XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE (XFRM_MSG_BASE + 8)

  #define XFRM_MSG_MAX (XFRM_MSG_EXPIRE+1)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:03 EST