Re: Route cache performance under stress

From: David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 04:59:06 EST

Next message: Krishna Kumar: "[PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types."
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 11:03:01 +0200

   On Fri, 23 May 2003 01:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
   "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:

> Then what does that comment above it mean? :-)

   I guess it refers to the implementation, not the code.

Ok, I fixed the fib_hash.c stuff to use get_order().
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Next message: Krishna Kumar: "[PATCH] - Wrong use of RTM_BASE in XFRM message types."
Previous message: Andi Kleen: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
In reply to: Andi Kleen: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
Next in thread: Andrew Morton: "Re: Route cache performance under stress"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:03 EST