On Fri, 23 May 2003 01:22:05 -0700 (PDT)
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
> I believe you.
>
> Then what does that comment above it mean? :-)
I guess it refers to the implementation, not the code.
For pure 2^n you could implement it much more efficiently using ffz()
(not that it really matters of course, most orders are 0)
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:03 EST