I dont think the hashes are similar - its the effect into the
slow path. I was told by someone who tested this on a priicey CISCO
that they simply die unless capable of a feature called CEF.
cheers,
jamal
On Mon, 19 May 2003, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Jamal Hadi <hadi@shell.cyberus.ca>
> Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Also used to attack CISCOs by them kiddies btw. We stand much better
> than any CISCO doing caching.
>
> I have to assume that the source address selection operates
> differently for attacking cisco equiptment, our hashes being
> identical would really be unbelievable :-)
>
>
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 23 2003 - 22:00:02 EST