Thanks David , people like you keep the wheel going
----- Original Message -----
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: <sureshsingh.keisam@analog.com>
Cc: <kevin.curtis@farsite.co.uk>; <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: possible delays in netif_rx
> From: "Suresh Singh K." <sureshsingh.keisam@analog.com>
> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:40:27 +0530
>
> And most router are based on Deterministic data & control path,
> using preemptive kernel. So perfromance-wise the "Non-deterministic"
> behaviour is still an issue if we want to use linux for "Core Router "
> applications unless Real-time extensions are used.
>
> If softirqd actually runs, things are severly out of whack on
> your computer.
>
> Softirq's should always normally run straight out of hw interrupt
> trap return.
>
> I'm going to stop posting to these lists, it's like talking to a brick
> wall half the time.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 15 2002 - 22:00:01 EST