Re: PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions

From: Glynn Clements (glynn.clements@virgin.net)
Date: Wed Jun 06 2001 - 22:28:52 EST

Next message: Philip Blundell: "Re: problem with 3c505"
Previous message: andrew may: "PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions"
In reply to: andrew may: "PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions"
Next in thread: acmay@acmay.homeip.net: "Re: PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions"
Reply: acmay@acmay.homeip.net: "Re: PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

andrew may wrote:

> So even though the PMTU from end to end may be smaller than the MTU
> for the next hop, I still don't want to fragment until after going
> through the next hop. After that it will be fine to fragment the
> packet as needed.

sysctl -w net/ipv4/ip_no_pmtu_disc=1

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn.clements@virgin.net>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org

Next message: Philip Blundell: "Re: problem with 3c505"
Previous message: andrew may: "PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions"
In reply to: andrew may: "PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions"
Next in thread: acmay@acmay.homeip.net: "Re: PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions"
Reply: acmay@acmay.homeip.net: "Re: PMTU vs device MTU and Frag decisions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 07 2001 - 21:01:16 EST