Re: multiple addresses

From: Nick Bastin (nbastin@mil3.com)
Date: Tue Feb 29 2000 - 11:01:12 EST

Next message: Dennis: "Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166/400"
Previous message: Glynn Clements: "Re: IPChains counter wrapping"
In reply to: Alex Pope: "Re: multiple addresses"
Next in thread: Stephen Satchell: "Re: multiple addresses"
Reply: Stephen Satchell: "Re: multiple addresses"
Reply: David Lang: "Re: multiple addresses"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: multiple addresses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

>On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Sharad Joshi wrote:
>
>> Folks,
>>
>> Is there any specific need of having multiple IP Addresses for a network
>> interface?
>
>Of course. Virtual hosting for example.

Ok, this is a *terrible* example. Anybody using multiple IPs for virtual
hosting is contributing to a misallocation of IP address space. If you're
still using a web server that doesn't support HTTP/1.1, find one that does.

-- Nick Bastin Software Developer OPNET Technologies

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Dennis: "Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166/400"
Previous message: Glynn Clements: "Re: IPChains counter wrapping"
In reply to: Alex Pope: "Re: multiple addresses"
Next in thread: Stephen Satchell: "Re: multiple addresses"
Reply: Stephen Satchell: "Re: multiple addresses"
Reply: David Lang: "Re: multiple addresses"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: multiple addresses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:28 EST