At 09:14 AM 2/24/00 -0500, Rakers, Jason wrote:
>For comparison:
>2500 has 20mhz processor, process switch 1000pps, fast switch 4000pps
>2600 has 40mhz processor, process switch 1500pps, fast switch 15000pps
>3620 has 80mhz processor, process switch 2000pps, fast switch 50000pps
>3640 has 100mhz processor, process switch 4000pps, fast switch 70000pps
>7200 varies from 100 to 300mhz, process switch 10000pps, fast switch
>120000pps
>
>Of course those are Cisco numbers, but from experience they are pretty
>close.
Sure, as long as you dont have any filters or shaping set. if you do, the
numbers go WAY down.
dennis
>
>Jason
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Scott Laird [SMTP:laird@internap.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2000 12:20 AM
>> To: Mr. James W. Laferriere
>> Cc: Brian J. Schrock; linux-net@vger.rutgers.edu
>> Subject: Re: Performance Tests Cisco 2514 and Pentium 166/400
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Mr. James W. Laferriere wrote:
>> > >Comparisons with 26xx and 36xx
>> > > routers would be more interesting, as would tests of various 7[25]xx
>> > > routers.
>> > God, not asking for much are we .
>> > How many of -us- have spare 2600's/3600/7200/7500 lying about ?
>>
>> Funny you mention that :-). We have spare 2514/3640/7200/7500/12008 plus
>> a smartbits sitting ~50 feet from my office, but I don't really have time
>> to run benchmarks right now. The results *would* be interesting, though.
>>
>> Particularly if I had a couple PCI GigE cards to test with.
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 29 2000 - 21:00:26 EST