Re: Devfs implementation.
Dan Hollis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sun, 20 Jun 1999 20:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Horst von Brand wrote:
> The problem with devfs, IMVHO, is that it solves the _easy_ half of the
> problem. The _hard_ part is permission management (includes persistence,
> default permissions, etc). And at least default permission management is
> _policy_ and DOES NOT belong into the kernel.
Which is why theres the userspace devfsd.
I thought we had covered this already.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to email@example.com
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/