>> Dec 29 10:12:15 zahn vmunix: nfs_stat_to_errno: bad nfs status
>> return value: 39 Dec 29 10:12:46 zahn last message repeated 117
Alan> That probably means unfsd handed back a bogus report value. Does
Alan> beta37 also show this, also does it co-incide with the removal
Alan> of a non empty directory
It appears that NFS Server 2.2beta37 does not show this effect,
and yes, the removal of a directory, that is sometimes nonempty,
is involved in the test.
So it is likely a bug/feature of NFS Server 2.2beta29, but it may be
worth to check what happens with knfsd as server, the source
of the test program is at http://www.snafu.de/~zahn/test2.c
-- home email: user@domain where domain=berlin.snafu.de, user=zahn Use of my address for unsolicited commercial advertising is forbidden. 2^3021377 - 1 | "Where do you want to crash today?"
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/