Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: bd96801 PMIC core

[Matti Vaittinen]

On 4/15/24 08:50, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> Morning Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks again for the review/help!
>
> On 4/14/24 00:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 12/04/2024 13:21, Matti Vaittinen wrote
> > > +
> > > +  rohm,hw-timeout-ms:
> > > +    description:
> > > +      Watchdog timeout value(s). First walue is timeout limit. 
> > > Second value is
> > > +      optional value for 'too early' watchdog ping if window timeout 
> > > mode is
> > > +      to be used.
> >
> > Standard property timeout-sec does not work for you? It should allow two
> > items as well.
>
> I don't think so. We need sub-second units. Furthermore, the timeout-sec 
> (if I understand it correctly) updates the "timeout policy", which tells 
> the expected ping-interval. This can be different from the "HW 
> heart-beat" which tells the HW's ping expectation. Hence the "hw-" prefix.

Oh, I just found out that this is an existing property. The ROHM 
BD9576/BD9573 do aleady use this. It seems I've had some discussion 
about it with Rob/Guenter when adding it. Frightening thing is that I 
didin't remember the discussion or that the property existed at all... 
Well, luckily we have lore :)

https://lore.kernel.org/all/c390476e4279d8b75de53271e9fb8948d8854528.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/#r

(I don't see the final conclusion in this discussion, it has probably 
been done on some later version of the series).

Yours,
	-- Matti

--
Matti Vaittinen
Linux kernel developer at ROHM Semiconductors
Oulu Finland

~~ When things go utterly wrong vim users can always type :help! ~~