Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: Add support for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5

From: Alexandru Serdeliuc
Date: Sun Apr 07 2024 - 06:23:56 EST


Hi, please excuse my lack of knowledge, I am still trying to figure out how to properly send a patch. Hopefully not wasting your time too much.


Here is what was changed, or I should send a v5 and add the modifications to cover letter?

- v4

  . removed a spurious new line

  . removed pcie_1_phy_aux_clk as requested

  . removed secondary pcie1 which does not exists on the device

  . changed firmware extension from .mbn to .mdt

  . added missing reserved memory regions required  by firmware to properly load


- v3

  . added b4 version 3

  . removed address and size cells in device description


- v2 added both but added an extra v2 in the subject line instead to b4 subject header, was requested to send the patch again, along with following mods:

  . removed whole bootargs line

  . fixed underscores in reserved memory by removing all reserved memory regions

  . added missing idetation to  spash_screen remark

  . validated the dts with "dtbs_check"

  . removed all comments at the end of nodes

  . moved status of the node at the end of the node

  . reversed pin control name with control numbers

  . ordered the  nodes alphabetically


- The initial request was split in two patches sent due to the following checkpatch warning, was requested to re send them together:

WARNING: DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst


On 7/4/24 11:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 07/04/2024 07:38, Alexandru Marc Serdeliuc via B4 Relay wrote:
From: Alexandru Marc Serdeliuc <serdeliuk@xxxxxxxxx>

Add support for Samsung Galaxy Z Fold5 (q5q) foldable phone based on sm8550

Currently working features:
- Framebuffer
- UFS
- i2c
- Buttons

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Marc Serdeliuc <serdeliuk@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
Where is the changelog? This is v4 and nothing (neither here nor in
cover letter) explained what was happening with this patchset.

Tags were ignored, so maybe comments as well?

Please provide *full* and detailed changelog.

Best regards,
Krzysztof