Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] bpf/verifier: add bpf_timer as a kfunc capable type

From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
Date: Fri Mar 22 2024 - 12:31:35 EST


On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 15:57, Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We need to extend the bpf_timer API, but the way forward relies on kfuncs.
> So make bpf_timer known for kfuncs from the verifier PoV
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> changes in v5:
> - also check for the reg offset
>
> changes in v4:
> - enforce KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER to be of type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE
>
> new in v3 (split from v2 02/10)
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 63749ad5ac6b..24a604e26ec7 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -10826,6 +10826,7 @@ enum {
> KF_ARG_LIST_NODE_ID,
> KF_ARG_RB_ROOT_ID,
> KF_ARG_RB_NODE_ID,
> + KF_ARG_TIMER_ID,
> };
>
> BTF_ID_LIST(kf_arg_btf_ids)
> @@ -10834,6 +10835,7 @@ BTF_ID(struct, bpf_list_head)
> BTF_ID(struct, bpf_list_node)
> BTF_ID(struct, bpf_rb_root)
> BTF_ID(struct, bpf_rb_node)
> +BTF_ID(struct, bpf_timer_kern)
>
> static bool __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(const struct btf *btf,
> const struct btf_param *arg, int type)
> @@ -10877,6 +10879,12 @@ static bool is_kfunc_arg_rbtree_node(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_par
> return __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(btf, arg, KF_ARG_RB_NODE_ID);
> }
>
> +static bool is_kfunc_arg_timer(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_param *arg)
> +{
> + bool ret = __is_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(btf, arg, KF_ARG_TIMER_ID);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static bool is_kfunc_arg_callback(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct btf *btf,
> const struct btf_param *arg)
> {
> @@ -10946,6 +10954,7 @@ enum kfunc_ptr_arg_type {
> KF_ARG_PTR_TO_NULL,
> KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR,
> KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MAP,
> + KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER,
> };
>
> enum special_kfunc_type {
> @@ -11102,6 +11111,9 @@ get_kfunc_ptr_arg_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> if (is_kfunc_arg_map(meta->btf, &args[argno]))
> return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_MAP;
>
> + if (is_kfunc_arg_timer(meta->btf, &args[argno]))
> + return KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER;
> +
> if ((base_type(reg->type) == PTR_TO_BTF_ID || reg2btf_ids[base_type(reg->type)])) {
> if (!btf_type_is_struct(ref_t)) {
> verbose(env, "kernel function %s args#%d pointer type %s %s is not supported\n",
> @@ -11735,6 +11747,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
> case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CALLBACK:
> case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_REFCOUNTED_KPTR:
> case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR:
> + case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER:
> /* Trusted by default */
> break;
> default:
> @@ -12021,6 +12034,16 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> break;
> + case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER:
> + if (reg->type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
> + verbose(env, "arg#%d doesn't point to a map value\n", i);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (reg->off) {
> + verbose(env, "arg#%d offset can not be greater than 0\n", i);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }

This won't be correct. You don't really check whether the timer exists
at reg->off (and if you did, this would still restrict it to 0 offset,
and not check the variable offset which would be non-zero). What I
would suggest is calling process_timer_func (see how dynptr calls the
same underlying process_dynptr_func to enforce type invariants). This
would allow sharing the same checks and avoid bugs from creeping in.
It does all checks wrt constant/variable offset and looking up the
timer field offset and matching it against the one in the pointer.

> + break;
> }
> }
>
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
>