[PATCH net 02/13] mptcp: add needs_id for netlink appending addr

From: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
Date: Thu Feb 15 2024 - 13:26:32 EST


From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Just the same as userspace PM, a new parameter needs_id is added for
in-kernel PM mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr() too.

Add a new helper mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id() to check whether an address
ID is set from PM or not.

In mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(), needs_id is always true, but in
mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(), pass mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id() to
needs_it.

Fixes: efd5a4c04e18 ("mptcp: add the address ID assignment bitmap")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 287a60381eae..a24c9128dee9 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -901,7 +901,8 @@ static void __mptcp_pm_release_addr_entry(struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry)
}

static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet,
- struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry)
+ struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry,
+ bool needs_id)
{
struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *cur, *del_entry = NULL;
unsigned int addr_max;
@@ -949,7 +950,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet,
}
}

- if (!entry->addr.id) {
+ if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id) {
find_next:
entry->addr.id = find_next_zero_bit(pernet->id_bitmap,
MPTCP_PM_MAX_ADDR_ID + 1,
@@ -960,7 +961,7 @@ static int mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet,
}
}

- if (!entry->addr.id)
+ if (!entry->addr.id && needs_id)
goto out;

__set_bit(entry->addr.id, pernet->id_bitmap);
@@ -1092,7 +1093,7 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_get_local_id(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct mptcp_addr_info *skc
entry->ifindex = 0;
entry->flags = MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_IMPLICIT;
entry->lsk = NULL;
- ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry);
+ ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry, true);
if (ret < 0)
kfree(entry);

@@ -1285,6 +1286,18 @@ static int mptcp_nl_add_subflow_or_signal_addr(struct net *net)
return 0;
}

+static bool mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(const struct nlattr *attr,
+ struct genl_info *info)
+{
+ struct nlattr *tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX + 1];
+
+ if (!nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_MAX, attr,
+ mptcp_pm_address_nl_policy, info->extack) &&
+ tb[MPTCP_PM_ADDR_ATTR_ID])
+ return true;
+ return false;
+}
+
int mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
{
struct nlattr *attr = info->attrs[MPTCP_PM_ENDPOINT_ADDR];
@@ -1326,7 +1339,8 @@ int mptcp_pm_nl_add_addr_doit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
goto out_free;
}
}
- ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry);
+ ret = mptcp_pm_nl_append_new_local_addr(pernet, entry,
+ !mptcp_pm_has_addr_attr_id(attr, info));
if (ret < 0) {
GENL_SET_ERR_MSG_FMT(info, "too many addresses or duplicate one: %d", ret);
goto out_free;

--
2.43.0