Re: [PATCH 2/2] phy: qualcomm: eusb2-repeater: Drop the redundant zeroing

[Abel Vesa]

On 24-01-05 11:09:33, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 5.01.2024 10:16, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > On 24-01-04 23:50:48, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> >> On 4.01.2024 15:52, Abel Vesa wrote:
> >>> The local init_tlb is already zero initialized, so the entire zeroing loop
> >>> is useless in this case, since the initial values are copied over anyway,
> >>> before being written.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 99a517a582fc ("phy: qualcomm: phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater: Zero out untouched tuning regs")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> That's another good spot.. partial struct initialization of
> >> pm8550b_init_tbl zeroes out the uninitialized fields.
> >>
> >>
> >>>  drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c | 10 ----------
> >>>  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c
> >>> index 5f5862a68b73..3060c0749797 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater.c
> >>> @@ -156,16 +156,6 @@ static int eusb2_repeater_init(struct phy *phy)
> >>>  
> >>>  	regmap_field_update_bits(rptr->regs[F_EN_CTL1], EUSB2_RPTR_EN, EUSB2_RPTR_EN);
> >>>  
> >>> -	for (i = 0; i < F_NUM_TUNE_FIELDS; i++) {
> >>> -		if (init_tbl[i]) {
> >>> -			regmap_field_update_bits(rptr->regs[i], init_tbl[i], init_tbl[i]);
> >>> -		} else {
> >>> -			/* Write 0 if there's no value set */
> >>> -			u32 mask = GENMASK(regfields[i].msb, regfields[i].lsb);
> >>> -
> >>> -			regmap_field_update_bits(rptr->regs[i], mask, 0);
> >>> -		}
> >>> -	}
> >>>  	memcpy(init_tbl, rptr->cfg->init_tbl, sizeof(init_tbl));
> >>
> >> I think this patchset can be made even better, this memcpy is also
> >> useless and we can simply initialize init_tbl=rptr->cfg->init_tbl.
> > 
> > Actually no. The init_tbl in cfg is a pointer to const. Plus, if you do
> > that, you will end up with the same situation like in the other patch,
> > as there are some overrides based on DT values below this.
> 
> Hm, you're right. Maybe we should simple store *base and stop
> modifying these tables then. There's not a whole lot of regmap_rw
> calls, so making the first argument "rptr->base + rptr->regs[ASDF]"
> shouldn't add much fluff. Then we can make the cfg referernce const.
> 

Oh, sorry, did not see your reply in time before sending v2.

Have a look at v2 and we can decide if we want something different then.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240105-phy-qcom-eusb2-repeater-fixes-v2-0-775d98e7df05@xxxxxxxxxx/

Thanks for reviewing.

> Konrad
> 
> > 
> > But now that I've had another look, maybe doing the exact same thing as
> > the other patch does (kmemdup) will probably look better anyway,
> > specially if we do that on probe.
> > 
> >>
> >> Konrad