Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: sdhci-pci-gli: GL975x: Mask rootport's replay timer timeout during suspend

[Adrian Hunter]

On 4/01/24 06:10, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:53 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 04:23, Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Spamming `lspci -vv` can still observe the replay timer timeout error
>>> even after commit 015c9cbcf0ad ("mmc: sdhci-pci-gli: GL9750: Mask the
>>> replay timer timeout of AER"), albeit with a lower reproduce rate.
>>>
>>> Such AER interrupt can still prevent the system from suspending, so let
>>> root port mask and unmask replay timer timeout during suspend and
>>> resume, respectively.
>>>
>>> Cc: Victor Shih <victor.shih@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Ben Chuang <benchuanggli@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v2:
>>>  - Change subject to reflect it works on GL9750 & GL9755
>>>  - Fix when aer_cap is missing
>>>
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c |  2 +-
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c  | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h      |  1 +
>>>  3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>>> index 025b31aa712c..59ae4da72974 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>>> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int sdhci_pci_init_wakeup(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> -static int sdhci_pci_suspend_host(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>> +int sdhci_pci_suspend_host(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>>  {
>>>         int i, ret;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
>>> index 77911a57b12c..54943e9df835 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-gli.c
>>> @@ -1429,6 +1429,55 @@ static int sdhci_pci_gli_resume(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>>         return sdhci_pci_resume_host(chip);
>>>  }
>>>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCIEAER
>>> +static void mask_replay_timer_timeout(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct pci_dev *parent = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
>>> +       u32 val;
>>> +
>>> +       if (!parent || !parent->aer_cap)
>>
>> Wouldn't it be more correct to use pci_aer_available(), rather than
>> just checking the aer_cap?
> 
> pci_aer_available() is more of a global check, so checking aer_cap is
> still required for the device.

It is not obvious whether aer_cap is meant to be used outside PCI
internal code.  Maybe reading the offset directly is more
appropriate?

	aer_pos = pci_find_ext_capability(root, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ERR);


> 
>>
>> If pci_aer_available() can be used, we wouldn't even need the stubs as
>> the is already stubs for pci_aer_available().
> 
> A helper that checks both aer_cap and  pci_aer_available() can be
> added for such purpose, but there aren't many users of that.
> 
> Kai-Heng
> 
>>
>>> +               return;
>>> +
>>> +       pci_read_config_dword(parent, parent->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, &val);
>>> +       val |= PCI_ERR_COR_REP_TIMER;
>>> +       pci_write_config_dword(parent, parent->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, val);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void unmask_replay_timer_timeout(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> +       struct pci_dev *parent = pci_upstream_bridge(pdev);
>>> +       u32 val;
>>> +
>>> +       if (!parent || !parent->aer_cap)
>>> +               return;
>>> +
>>> +       pci_read_config_dword(pdev, parent->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, &val);
>>> +       val &= ~PCI_ERR_COR_REP_TIMER;
>>> +       pci_write_config_dword(pdev, parent->aer_cap + PCI_ERR_COR_MASK, val);
>>> +}
>>> +#else
>>> +static inline void mask_replay_timer_timeout(struct pci_dev *pdev) { }
>>> +static inline void unmask_replay_timer_timeout(struct pci_dev *pdev) {  }
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +static int sdhci_pci_gl975x_suspend(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>> +{
>>> +       mask_replay_timer_timeout(chip->pdev);
>>> +
>>> +       return sdhci_pci_suspend_host(chip);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int sdhci_pci_gl975x_resume(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>> +{
>>> +       int ret;
>>> +
>>> +       ret = sdhci_pci_gli_resume(chip);
>>> +
>>> +       unmask_replay_timer_timeout(chip->pdev);
>>> +
>>> +       return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>  static int gl9763e_resume(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>>  {
>>>         struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot = chip->slots[0];
>>> @@ -1547,7 +1596,8 @@ const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_gl9755 = {
>>>         .probe_slot     = gli_probe_slot_gl9755,
>>>         .ops            = &sdhci_gl9755_ops,
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>> -       .resume         = sdhci_pci_gli_resume,
>>> +       .suspend        = sdhci_pci_gl975x_suspend,
>>> +       .resume         = sdhci_pci_gl975x_resume,
>>>  #endif
>>>  };
>>>
>>> @@ -1570,7 +1620,8 @@ const struct sdhci_pci_fixes sdhci_gl9750 = {
>>>         .probe_slot     = gli_probe_slot_gl9750,
>>>         .ops            = &sdhci_gl9750_ops,
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>> -       .resume         = sdhci_pci_gli_resume,
>>> +       .suspend        = sdhci_pci_gl975x_suspend,
>>> +       .resume         = sdhci_pci_gl975x_resume,
>>>  #endif
>>>  };
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
>>> index 153704f812ed..19253dce687d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h
>>> @@ -190,6 +190,7 @@ static inline void *sdhci_pci_priv(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>>> +int sdhci_pci_suspend_host(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip);
>>>  int sdhci_pci_resume_host(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip);
>>>  #endif
>>>  int sdhci_pci_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host);
>>
>> Kind regards
>> Uffe