Re: [PATCH 2/6] dt-bindings: mfd: brcm,bcm59056: Add compatible for BCM59054

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Tue Oct 31 2023 - 01:54:28 EST


On 30/10/2023 20:36, Artur Weber wrote:
> The BCM59054 MFD is fairly similar to the BCM59056, and will use
> the same driver. Add compatible and specify the allowed regulator
> nodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml | 125 +++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml
> index 6d6acc9fd312..5b5044867eca 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,bcm59056.yaml
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ maintainers:
> properties:
> compatible:
> enum:
> + - "brcm,bcm59054"

Where do you see syntax with quotes?

> - "brcm,bcm59056"
>
> reg:
> @@ -24,43 +25,93 @@ properties:
> type: object
> description: Container node for regulators.
>
> - # The valid regulator node names for BCM59056 are:
> - # rfldo, camldo1, camldo2, simldo1, simldo2, sdldo, sdxldo,
> - # mmcldo1, mmcldo2, audldo, micldo, usbldo, vibldo,
> - # csr, iosr1, iosr2, msr, sdsr1, sdsr2, vsr,
> - # gpldo1, gpldo2, gpldo3, gpldo4, gpldo5, gpldo6,
> - # vbus
> - patternProperties:
> - "^(cam|sim|mmc)ldo[1-2]$":
> - type: object
> - $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> - unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> - "^(rf|sd|sdx|aud|mic|usb|vib)ldo$":
> - type: object
> - $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> - unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> - "^(c|m|v)sr$":
> - type: object
> - $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> - unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> - "^(io|sd)sr[1-2]$":
> - type: object
> - $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> - unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> - "^gpldo[1-6]$":
> - type: object
> - $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> - unevaluatedProperties: false
> -
> - properties:
> - "vbus":
> - type: object
> - $ref: /schemas/regulator/regulator.yaml#
> - unevaluatedProperties: false
> +allOf:

No. We do not define properties in allOf:if: block. If there are just
few differences, define all at the top level and disallow few (foo-bar:
false). If there are more, just create separate bindings.



Best regards,
Krzysztof