Re: [PATCH v3] mtd: Fix gluebi NULL pointer dereference caused by ftl notifier

From: Miquel Raynal
Date: Fri Oct 27 2023 - 13:40:39 EST


Hi ZhaoLong,

wangzhaolong1@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:20:33 +0800:

> If both flt.ko and gluebi.ko are loaded, the notiier of ftl

flt ? notifier

> triggers NULL pointer dereference when trying to access
> ‘gluebi->desc’ in gluebi_read().
>
> ubi_gluebi_init
> ubi_register_volume_notifier
> ubi_enumerate_volumes
> ubi_notify_all
> gluebi_notify nb->notifier_call()
> gluebi_create
> mtd_device_register
> mtd_device_parse_register
> add_mtd_device
> blktrans_notify_add not->add()
> ftl_add_mtd tr->add_mtd()

Glitches?

> scan_header
> mtd_read
> mtd_read_oob
> mtd_read_oob_std
> gluebi_read mtd->read()
> gluebi->desc - NULL
>
> Detailed reproduction information available at the link[1],
>
> The solution for the gluebi module is to run jffs2 on the UBI
> volume without considering working with ftl or mtdblock.[2].

I am sorry but ftl, gluebi, mtdblock, jffs2 and ubi in the same report
seem a little bit fuzzy. Are you sure about this sentence?

> Therefore, this problem can be avoided by preventing gluebi
> from creating mtdblock devices.

This sentence sounds wrong :)

> Fixes: 2ba3d76a1e29 ("UBI: make gluebi a separate module")
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217992 [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/441107100.23734.1697904580252.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxx/ [2]
> Signed-off-by: ZhaoLong Wang <wangzhaolong1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
> index ff18636e0889..5bc32108ca03 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
> @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static void blktrans_notify_add(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> struct mtd_blktrans_ops *tr;
>
> - if (mtd->type == MTD_ABSENT)
> + if (mtd->type == MTD_ABSENT || mtd->type == MTD_UBIVOLUME)
> return;
>
> list_for_each_entry(tr, &blktrans_majors, list)
> @@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ int register_mtd_blktrans(struct mtd_blktrans_ops *tr)
> mutex_lock(&mtd_table_mutex);
> list_add(&tr->list, &blktrans_majors);
> mtd_for_each_device(mtd)
> - if (mtd->type != MTD_ABSENT)
> + if (mtd->type != MTD_ABSENT && mtd->type != MTD_UBIVOLUME)
> tr->add_mtd(tr, mtd);
> mutex_unlock(&mtd_table_mutex);
> return 0;


Thanks,
Miquèl