Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: loongson,liointc: Fix warnings about liointc-2.0

[Huacai Chen]

Hi, Krzysztof

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 25/10/2023 03:56, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > Hi, Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:18 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:51:35 +0100,
> >> Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Krzysztof & Marc:
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the interruption.
> >>> As said before, we tried to use the 'interrupt-map attribute' in our
> >>> Loongson liointc dts(i), but there are some unfriendly points.
> >>> Do you have any other different suggestions?
> >>
> >> I don't have any suggestion, but if you are still thinking of adding
> >> some extra crap to the of_irq_imap_abusers[] array, the answer is a
> >> firm 'NO'.
> > Excuse me, but as described before, 'interrupt-map' cannot be used for
> > liointc unless adding it to of_irq_imap_abusers[], can we still use
> > 'parent_int_map' in this case? Or just change it to 'parent-int-map'
> > to satisfy the naming style?
>
> Why do you respond to me? You received firm 'NO' about
> of_irq_imap_abusers, so how adhering to naming style or violating naming
> style has anything to do with it?
I'm sorry but of_irq_imap_abusers is to make 'interrupt-map' to work,
without of_irq_imap_abusers we can only use the existing
'parent_int_map'. We need your response because we want to know
whether you can accept the existing method since the other approach
has received 'NO'. And, changing 'parent_int_map' to 'parent-int-map'
can be a little better, at least it satisfies the naming style.

Huacai
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>