On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 08:16:16PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
On 2023/10/25 20:12, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:Can you send a revert of c61c255e114c ASAP to Joerg please?
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 03:34:55PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:It's my fault. My apologies for not realizing that the helper would
Hi all,Intel folks, this is not nice 🙁 Why was the first commit done at all
Today's linux-next merge of the iommufd tree got a conflict in:
drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c
between commit:
c61c255e114c ("iommu/vt-d: Remove unused function")
from the iommu tree and commits:
f35f22cc760e ("iommu/vt-d: Access/Dirty bit support for SS domains")
cbf8b441ea08 ("iommu/vt-d: Add helper to setup pasid nested translation")
from the iommufd tree.
I fixed it up (the latter added a use of the function removed by
the former, so I just used the latter) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial
if the nesting series needs this?
still be used by the nesting translation series. I will be more careful
in the future.