Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: Add pm8916 vm-bms and lbc

[Lee Jones]

On Tue, 24 Oct 2023, Nikita Travkin wrote:

> Rob Herring писал(а) 23.10.2023 22:40:
> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:20:32 +0500, Nikita Travkin wrote:
> >> PM8916 (and probably some other similar pmics) have hardware blocks for
> >> battery monitoring and charging. Add patterns for respecive nodes so the
> >> devicetree for those blocks can be validated properly.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 ++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>
> > 
> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
> > 
> > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > 
> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml:
> > Error in referenced schema matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/supply/qcom,pm8916-bms-vm.yaml
> > 
> > doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
> > 
> > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20231023-pm8916-dtsi-bms-lbc-v2-1-343e3dbf423e@xxxxxxx
> > 
> > The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
> > should be noted in *this* patch.
> > 
> 
> Somehow I missed the memo and thought it tracks -next...
> 
> This patch depends on 7f590e3831 and 5cee843d56 in linux-next.git
> They were applied in [1].
> 
> I'm wondering if the bot just bails out when the "depend" is present
> or there is some more sophisticated logic to suggest the base to it?

So is this good to go, or not?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]