Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/123] 5.4.259-rc1 review

[Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)]

Hi Greg,

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:55:58PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.259 release.
> There are 123 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230511):
mips: 65 configs -> no failure
arm: 106 configs -> failed
arm64: 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure

Note:
arm builds are failing with the error:
drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:9: error: 'GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS' undeclared here (not in a function)
  251 |         GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:9: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:9: note: (near initialization for 'vf610_irqchip')
drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c: In function 'vf610_gpio_probe':
drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:340:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_irq_chip_set_chip' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  340 |         gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip);
      |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]

[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5353


Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
Regards
Sudip