Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: add description for mt8365-evk board

From: Macpaul Lin
Date: Tue Sep 12 2023 - 02:30:06 EST


On 9/11/23 17:49, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:


External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until you have verified the sender or the content.

On 11/09/2023 10:11, Macpaul Lin wrote:
Fix the missing description for MediaTek mt8365-evk board.

Fixes: 4f5fc078ac6f ("dt-bindings: arm64: dts: mediatek: Add mt8365-evk board")

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my
feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it.
Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.

In the previous modifications, I overlooked this suggestion. It will be corrected in the next version.

Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

change for v2:
- rebase this patch to follow the v5 patch set of mt8395.
- depends on https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230909132819.21626-2-macpaul.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx/T/
- Fix description as a single board.

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml
index 2e8ad49c3479..b163995e32d5 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/mediatek.yaml
@@ -244,7 +244,8 @@ properties:
- enum:
- mediatek,mt8183-pumpkin
- const: mediatek,mt8183
- - items:
+ - description: MediaTek Genio 350 Board (Genio 350 EVK)

Drop, no need, redundant (copies the compatible) and your other entries
do not have it.

The primary objective of this patch is to incorporate a description that will prevent users from confusing this platform with others. Additionally, it aids in identifying this as a "Genio EVK" for marketing purposes.


+ items:
- enum:

This is still confusing. Why do you have enum here with such description.


In order to accommodate the current market situation for a single reference board, will replace this with a 'const'.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Thanks
Macpaul Lin