Re: [PATCH 16/21] gpio: of: correct notifier return codes

From: Linus Walleij
Date: Thu Sep 07 2023 - 15:31:48 EST

Next message: Ojaswin Mujoo: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] ext4: Mark buffer new if it is unwritten to avoid stale data exposure"
Previous message: Szuying Chen: "[PATCH v4] ahci: libahci: clear pending interrupt status"
In reply to: Bartosz Golaszewski: "[PATCH 16/21] gpio: of: correct notifier return codes"
Next in thread: Bartosz Golaszewski: "[PATCH 09/21] gpiolib: reluctantly provide gpio_device_get_chip()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Tue, Sep 5, 2023 at 8:53 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> According to the comments in linux/notifier.h, the code to return when a
> notifications is "not for us" is NOTIFY_DONE, not NOTIFY_OK.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@xxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>

This should just be applied, right? If the notifiers already
went upstream (sorry for my ignorance) then it should be
a Fixes: even.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Next message: Ojaswin Mujoo: "Re: [PATCH 1/1] ext4: Mark buffer new if it is unwritten to avoid stale data exposure"
Previous message: Szuying Chen: "[PATCH v4] ahci: libahci: clear pending interrupt status"
In reply to: Bartosz Golaszewski: "[PATCH 16/21] gpio: of: correct notifier return codes"
Next in thread: Bartosz Golaszewski: "[PATCH 09/21] gpiolib: reluctantly provide gpio_device_get_chip()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]