Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: Vector checksum header

From: Conor Dooley
Date: Thu Sep 07 2023 - 12:38:52 EST


On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 09:46:52PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Vector code is written in assembly rather than using the GCC vector
> instrinsics because they did not provide optimal code. Vector
> instrinsic types are still used so the inline assembly can
> appropriately select vector registers. However, this code cannot be
> merged yet because it is currently not possible to use vector
> instrinsics in the kernel because vector support needs to be directly
> enabled by assembly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> index 3f9d5a202e95..1d6c23cd1221 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@
> #include <linux/in6.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
> +#include <riscv_vector.h>
> +#endif
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
> typedef unsigned int csum_t;
> #else
> @@ -43,6 +47,89 @@ static inline __sum16 csum_fold(__wsum sum)
> */
> static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> + /*
> + * Vector is likely available when the kernel is compiled with
> + * vector support, so nop when vector is available and jump when
> + * vector is not available.
> + */
> + asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_vector]", "nop", 0,
> + RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, 1)
> + :
> + :
> + :
> + : no_vector);
> + } else {
> + if (!__riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, RISCV_ISA_EXT_v))
> + goto no_vector;
> + }
> +
> + vuint64m1_t prev_buffer;
> + vuint32m1_t curr_buffer;
> + unsigned int vl;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_32_BIT
> + csum_t high_result, low_result;
> +
> + riscv_v_enable();
> + asm(".option push \n\
> + .option arch, +v \n\
> + vsetivli x0, 1, e64, ta, ma \n\

Also, I don't see that you have addressed previous review comments from
Samuel:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/0a8c98bf-46da-e77a-0431-a6c1e224af2e@xxxxxxxxxx/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature