Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: dts: ipq5018: Correct uart1_pins pinconf

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sun Sep 03 2023 - 13:15:56 EST


On 01/09/2023 16:10, Ziyang Huang wrote:
> In pinctrl, the pinconfigs for uart are named "blspX_uartY".
> X is the UART ID. Starts from 1.
> 1-6 are in BLSP Block 1.
> 7-12 are in BLSP Block 2.
> Y is the index of mux config. Starts from 0.
>
> In dts, the serials are also named "blspX_uartY", but with different logic.
> X is the BLSP Block ID. Starts from 1.
> Y is the uart id inside block.
> In "ipq6018.dtsi" and "ipq8074.dtsi", it starts from 1.
> But in "ipq5332.dtsi" and "ipq9574.dtsi", it starts from 0.
>
> +-----------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
> | Block ID | ID inside Block | dts name | pinconfig name |
> | (Starts from 1) | (Starts from 1) | | |
> +-----------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
> | 1 | 1 | blsp1_uart1 | blsp0_uartY |
> | 1 | 2 | blsp1_uart2 | blsp1_uartY |
> | 1 | 6 | blsp1_uart6 | blsp5_uartY |
> | 2 | 1 | blsp2_uart1 | blsp6_uartY |
> | 2 | 6 | blsp2_uart6 | blsp12_uartY |
> +-----------------+-----------------+-------------+-----------------+
>
> In "ipq5018.dts", "blsp1_uart1" (dts name) is the first serial (confimed
> by the address), So its pinconfig should be "blsp0_uart0" (pinconfig name,
> use GPIO 20 and 21) or "blsp0_uart1" (pinconfig name, use GPIO 28 and 29).
>
> Fixes: 570006756a16 ("arm64: dts: Add ipq5018 SoC and rdp432-c2 board support")
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Huang <hzyitc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Use corrent name in From
>
> Changes since v2:
> - Define 2 pinconfs for uart1 in ipq5018.dtsi
> - rdp432-c2 use uart1_pins_a
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts
> index e636a1cb9b77..e83d1863e89c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018-rdp432-c2.dts
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ chosen {
> };
>
> &blsp1_uart1 {
> - pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins_a>;
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> status = "okay";
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
> index 9f13d2dcdfd5..50b4a2bd6fd3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5018.dtsi
> @@ -103,11 +103,18 @@ tlmm: pinctrl@1000000 {
> interrupt-controller;
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>
> - uart1_pins: uart1-state {
> - pins = "gpio31", "gpio32", "gpio33", "gpio34";
> - function = "blsp1_uart1";
> + uart1_pins_a: uart1@0 {

Regardless of other topics, change to @0 is neither correct, nor
explained in commit msg.

It does not look like you tested the DTS against bindings. Please run
`make dtbs_check W=1` (see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst or
https://www.linaro.org/blog/tips-and-tricks-for-validating-devicetree-sources-with-the-devicetree-schema/
for instructions).

Best regards,
Krzysztof