Re: [PATCH 2/3] regulator: userspace-consumer: Add regulator event support

From: Zev Weiss
Date: Fri Sep 01 2023 - 05:27:33 EST


On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 05:14:09AM PDT, Naresh Solanki wrote:
Add sysfs attribute to track regulator events received from regulator
notifier block handler.

Signed-off-by: Naresh Solanki <Naresh.Solanki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c b/drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c
index 97f075ed68c9..a936661d99cd 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/userspace-consumer.c
@@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ struct userspace_consumer_data {

int num_supplies;
struct regulator_bulk_data *supplies;
+
+ struct kobject *kobj;
+ struct notifier_block nb;
+ unsigned long events;
};

static ssize_t name_show(struct device *dev,
@@ -89,12 +93,30 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
return count;
}

+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(events_lock);
+
+static ssize_t events_show(struct device *dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+ struct userspace_consumer_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ unsigned long e;
+
+ spin_lock(&events_lock);
+ e = data->events;
+ data->events = 0;

I still don't think this is a good solution for the problem.

I for one frequently examine things in sysfs using shell commands like 'cat' and 'grep' and such, and I suspect I'm (very, very) far from alone in that. With this design a user doing that could cause a monitoring daemon to miss events that it was expecting to receive via this file.
I don't think we should be creating sysfs files that are secretly land mines that allow a curious user innocently peeking around in sysfs doing (they think) read-only operations to break things for other programs using those files.


Zev