Re: #pragma once?

[Dave Jones]

On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:33:49PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
 > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
 > > Does anyone have any objection to the use of "#pragma once" instead of
 > > the usual #ifndef-#define-...-#endif include guard?  GCC, LLVM/clang,
 > > and the latest Sparse all support either method just fine.  (I added
 > > support to Sparse myself.)  Both have equivalent performance.  "#pragma
 > > once" is simpler, and avoids the possibility of a typo in the defined
 > > guard symbol.
 > 
 > Does anybody know whether other static code analysis tools such as
 > Coverity can handle #pragma once?

Coverity should be fine. If it does break, I'm sure they'd fix it.

	Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/