Re: [PATCH 0/7] sched: cleanup trigger_load_balance

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 01/06/2014 12:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 06:19:04PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > I understand. Happy new year !
>
> Happy new year to you too! :-)
>
> > ps : the patchset is based on tip/sched/core
>
> Weird; because tip/sched/core as per today looks like:
>
>
> 029632fbb7b7c kernel/sched_fair.c (Peter Zijlstra       2011-10-25 10:00:11 +0200 6872) void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
>
> And your patches assume it looks like:
>
> Patch 1: @@ -6878,7 +6878,7 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
> Patch 2: @@ -6875,10 +6875,10 @@ void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
> Patch 4:
>   void trigger_load_balance(struct rq *rq)
>   {
> -       int cpu = rq->cpu;
> -
>
> Which obviously doesn't quite work..
>
>
> So I can make it fit.. but I do wonder what I'm missing here..


Ah, ok. I got it. I missed to send the first patch of my patchset:

sched: reduce trigger_load_balance parameters

Let me resend the patchset with the missing patch.

Sorry for the inconvenience

  -- Daniel



--
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/