Re: [PATCH 1/2] seqlock: Use raw_ prefix instead of _no_lockdep

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 04:28:31PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On 01/02/2014 04:50 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:11 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Linus disliked the _no_lockdep() naming, so instead
> >> use the more-consistent raw_* prefix to the non-lockdep
> >> enabled seqcount methods.
> >>
> >> This also adds raw_ methods for the write operations
> >> as well, which will be utilized in a following patch.
> > Ack on this and on 2/2. I'm assuming I'll get them through the -tip
> > tree, which is where the problem came from. No?
> 
> It seems Peter or Ingo are still on holiday. Hopefully they will be back
> on Monday to queue these.

Done! thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/