Re: [PATCH v3]vt: use vc_allocate in con_init

[Jiri Slaby]

On 01/02/2014 08:48 AM, Wang YanQing wrote:
> After a5f4f52e82114e85aa1a066bd1a450acc19a464d
> ("vt: use kzalloc() instead of the bootmem allocator"),
> con_init began to use kzalloc to initialize vc_data, 
> this patch convert con_init to use vc_allocate.
> 
> The benefit we get:
> 1: reduce code duplication
> 2: vc_allocate is more robust
> 3: use kmalloc instead of kzalloc for vc_screenbuf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang YanQing <udknight@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Changes v2-v3:
>  1: fix warnings reported by checkpatch.pl 
>  2: clarify changelog
> 
>  drivers/tty/vt/vt.c       | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
>  drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c |  8 ++++----
>  include/linux/vt_kern.h   |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> index 15aaa01..720a8f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt.c
> @@ -748,7 +748,8 @@ static void visual_init(struct vc_data *vc, int num, int init)
>  	vc->vc_screenbuf_size = vc->vc_rows * vc->vc_size_row;
>  }
>  
> -int vc_allocate(unsigned int currcons)	/* return 0 on success */
> +/* return 0 on success */
> +int vc_allocate(unsigned int currcons, int early)

Could you use
  bool/true/false
instead of
  int/1/0
please?

-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/