Re: [PATCH 1/3] kconfig: consolidate arch-specific seccomp options

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Dave,

On Sat, 04 Jan 2014 11:04:20 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 01/04/2014 07:38 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:20:14 -0800 Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
> >> that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
> >> other syscall.  It is absurd to have the option in the
> >> arch-specific menus.
> > 
> > You seem to have (mostly) lost the dependency some of the architecture
> > versions of config SECCOMP had on PROC_FS ...
> 
> I _believe_ the /proc interface has gone away.  I can't find any
> reference to /proc/<pid>/seccomp in any of the code.  Is there some
> /proc dependency that I'm missing outside of the removed
> /proc/<pid>/seccomp interface?

I don't know, but if it has gone then it is worth mentioning in the
commit message ... and you did preserve the dependency in the sparc64
case.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature