[PATCH] x86/boot: use .code16 instead of .code16gcc

[David Woodhouse]

This reverts commit 28b48688 ("x86, boot: use .code16gcc instead
of .code16").

Versions of binutils older than 2.16 are already not working, so this
workaround is no longer necessary either.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Since I just made .code16 work in LLVM, this removes one more barrier to
building the kernel with LLVM/clang. And it looks like 'clang -m16' for
the C code in arch/x86/boot shouldn't actually be that hard to do now
either.

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
index 1dfbf64..5077937 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/bioscall.S
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
  * touching registers they shouldn't be.
  */
 
-	.code16gcc
+	.code16
 	.text
 	.globl	intcall
 	.type	intcall, @function
diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/copy.S b/arch/x86/boot/copy.S
index 11f272c..07a7a4a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/copy.S
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/copy.S
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
  * Memory copy routines
  */
 
-	.code16gcc
+	.code16
 	.text
 
 GLOBAL(memcpy)


-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

-- 
dwmw2

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature