[PATCH v13 13/19] xen/pvh: Piggyback on PVHVM for event channels (v2)

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

From: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>

PVH is a PV guest with a twist - there are certain things
that work in it like HVM and some like PV. There is
a similar mode - PVHVM where we run in HVM mode with
PV code enabled - and this patch explores that.

The most notable PV interfaces are the XenBus and event channels.

We will piggyback on how the event channel mechanism is
used in PVHVM - that is we want the normal native IRQ mechanism
and we will install a vector (hvm callback) for which we
will call the event channel mechanism.

This means that from a pvops perspective, we can use
native_irq_ops instead of the Xen PV specific. Albeit in the
future we could support pirq_eoi_map. But that is
a feature request that can be shared with PVHVM.

Signed-off-by: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c |  5 +++--
 arch/x86/xen/irq.c       |  5 ++++-
 drivers/xen/events.c     | 14 +++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
index fde62c4..628099a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
@@ -1144,8 +1144,9 @@ void xen_setup_vcpu_info_placement(void)
 		xen_vcpu_setup(cpu);
 
 	/* xen_vcpu_setup managed to place the vcpu_info within the
-	   percpu area for all cpus, so make use of it */
-	if (have_vcpu_info_placement) {
+	 * percpu area for all cpus, so make use of it. Note that for
+	 * PVH we want to use native IRQ mechanism. */
+	if (have_vcpu_info_placement && !xen_pvh_domain()) {
 		pv_irq_ops.save_fl = __PV_IS_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_save_fl_direct);
 		pv_irq_ops.restore_fl = __PV_IS_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_restore_fl_direct);
 		pv_irq_ops.irq_disable = __PV_IS_CALLEE_SAVE(xen_irq_disable_direct);
diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/irq.c b/arch/x86/xen/irq.c
index 0da7f86..76ca326 100644
--- a/arch/x86/xen/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/xen/irq.c
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
 #include <xen/interface/xen.h>
 #include <xen/interface/sched.h>
 #include <xen/interface/vcpu.h>
+#include <xen/features.h>
 #include <xen/events.h>
 
 #include <asm/xen/hypercall.h>
@@ -128,6 +129,8 @@ static const struct pv_irq_ops xen_irq_ops __initconst = {
 
 void __init xen_init_irq_ops(void)
 {
-	pv_irq_ops = xen_irq_ops;
+	/* For PVH we use default pv_irq_ops settings. */
+	if (!xen_feature(XENFEAT_hvm_callback_vector))
+		pv_irq_ops = xen_irq_ops;
 	x86_init.irqs.intr_init = xen_init_IRQ;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
index 4035e83..783b972 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
@@ -1908,8 +1908,15 @@ void __init xen_init_IRQ(void)
 	pirq_needs_eoi = pirq_needs_eoi_flag;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86
-	if (xen_hvm_domain()) {
+	if (xen_pv_domain()) {
+		irq_ctx_init(smp_processor_id());
+		if (xen_initial_domain())
+			pci_xen_initial_domain();
+	}
+	if (xen_feature(XENFEAT_hvm_callback_vector))
 		xen_callback_vector();
+
+	if (xen_hvm_domain()) {
 		native_init_IRQ();
 		/* pci_xen_hvm_init must be called after native_init_IRQ so that
 		 * __acpi_register_gsi can point at the right function */
@@ -1918,13 +1925,10 @@ void __init xen_init_IRQ(void)
 		int rc;
 		struct physdev_pirq_eoi_gmfn eoi_gmfn;
 
-		irq_ctx_init(smp_processor_id());
-		if (xen_initial_domain())
-			pci_xen_initial_domain();
-
 		pirq_eoi_map = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO);
 		eoi_gmfn.gmfn = virt_to_mfn(pirq_eoi_map);
 		rc = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_pirq_eoi_gmfn_v2, &eoi_gmfn);
+		/* TODO: No PVH support for PIRQ EOI */
 		if (rc != 0) {
 			free_page((unsigned long) pirq_eoi_map);
 			pirq_eoi_map = NULL;
-- 
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/