Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: clk_round_rate() can return azero upon error

From: Zhang Rui
Date: Wed Jan 01 2014 - 21:51:19 EST


On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 18:09 -0800, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Treat both negative and zero return values from clk_round_rate() as
> errors. This is needed since subsequent patches will convert
> clk_round_rate()'s return value to be an unsigned type, rather than a
> signed type, since some clock sources can generate rates higher than
> (2^31)-1 Hz.
>
> Eventually, when calling clk_round_rate(), only a return value of zero
> will be considered a error. All other values will be considered valid
> rates. The comparison against values less than 0 is kept to preserve
> the correct behavior in the meantime.
>
> This patch also gets rid of a comparison between unsigned and signed
> values; a side-benefit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <pwalmsley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>

Eduardo,

will you take this patch?

thanks,
rui
> ---
> Applies on v3.13-rc3. See also:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138542591313620&w=2
>
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> index 74c0e3474d6e..8fe46dbc0c6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ int ti_bandgap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> clk_rate = clk_round_rate(bgp->div_clk,
> bgp->conf->sensors[0].ts_data->max_freq);
> if (clk_rate < bgp->conf->sensors[0].ts_data->min_freq ||
> - clk_rate == 0xffffffff) {
> + clk_rate <= 0) {
> ret = -ENODEV;
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "wrong clock rate (%d)\n", clk_rate);
> goto put_clks;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/