Re: [RFC PATCH] memcg: oom: fix totalpages calculation forswappiness==0

From: Michal Hocko
Date: Thu Oct 11 2012 - 04:50:36 EST


On Wed 10-10-12 13:50:21, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I am sending the patch below as an RFC because I am not entirely happy
> > about myself and maybe somebody can come up with a different approach
> > which would be less hackish.
>
> I don't see this as hackish,

I didn't like how swappiness spreads outside of the LRU scanning code...

> if memory.swappiness limits access to swap then this shouldn't be
> factored into the calculation, and that's what your patch fixes.
>
> The reason why the process with the largest rss isn't killed in this case
> is because all processes have CAP_SYS_ADMIN so they get a 3% bonus;

OK I should have mentioned that I have tested it as root which makes a
big difference with the current upstream as totalpages are considered
only if adj!=0.
I have originally seen the problem in 3.0 kernel (with fe35004f applied)
where the calculation is different (missing a7f638f9) and we always
consider total_pages there so it doesn't depend on root or oom_score_adj.

> when factoring swap into the calculation and subtracting 3% from
> the score in oom_badness(), they all end up having an internal
> score of 1 so they are all considered equal. It appears like the
> cgroup_iter_next() iteration for memcg ooms does this in reverse
> order, which is actually helpful so it will select the task that is
> newer.
>
> The only suggestion I have to make is specify this is for
> memory.swappiness in the patch title, otherwise:

OK. I will also update the changelog to mention oom_score_adj and
CAP_SYS_ADMIN, mark the patch for stable and repost it.

> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/